Organizational Leadership as a System
Organizational leadership can
be seen in different ways depending on the perspective and approach of the
leader, or of anyone interested on the subject. First it is important to understand
the definition of organizational leadership, to than analyze the distinction between
these perspectives.
In accordance to TDK Technologies, organizational
leadership is a dual focused management approach that
works towards what is best for individuals and what is best for a group as a
whole, simultaneously. It also mentions that it is also an
attitude and a work ethic that empowers an individual in any role to lead from
the top, middle, or bottom of an organization. Complementing this
definition, MSG Experts say that organizational
leadership deals with both human psychology as well
as expert tactics. It emphasizes on developing leadership skills and abilities
that are relevant across the organizations.
There can be not just a distinction
but often a contradiction between seeing organizational leadership as a simple body
of information or as a system of thinking. Considering the definitions and
descriptions mentioned previously, seeing the term simply as a body of
information, it lacks on comprehension. There would be gaps with crucial
questions as: what to do with this information? How to approach it? Who to
direct to? For what? And so on.
It is impossible to approach
the term as just information given. Since it involves individuals, attitude,
ethic, human psychology, tactics, all together, it is a must to involve thinking,
or better than that, system of thinking. We can use a body of information
associated to it, however not compare one definition with another. Most of the organizations, especially in a
time of constant changes witnessed nowadays, faces continual challenges which
can turn to conflict and threats to any business. Thinking through the
challenges as a whole, in a system perspective, it is crucial for
organizational leaders and can define the future of their organization. Kaufman
et al. (2003, p. 57) also highlights the importance of thinking and acting
holistically for high payoff results. As leaders, we must to think through a
system. The performance of a system
depends on how the parts are connected and how they relate. (Kaufman et al.,
2003, p. 61).
Considering organizational
leadership as a system of thinking does not change how I see and approach my
course work, however it makes me keep focused on a holistic point of view
through the discipline, facing leadership as complex system, where thinking critically
plays an essential role through dynamic times.
“The greatest danger in times of
turbulence is not the turbulence. It is to act with yesterday’s logic.” (Drucker, 1993).
Drucker P.
(1993). Post-capitalist society. New
York – NY: HarperBusiness.
Kaufman R.,
Oakley-Browne H., Watkins R., Leigh. D. (2003). Strategic planning for success: Aligning people, performance and
payoffs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer.
MSG Management
Study Guide. Organizational Leadership.
Retrieved from https://managementstudyguide.com/organizational-leadership.htm#
TDK
Technologies. Key Components of
Organizational Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.tdktech.com/tech-talks/key-components-of-organizational-leadership
No comments:
Post a Comment